Ten Years That Changed Evaluation · Part 5 of 12

Equity, decolonisation and localisation

USAID's 2021 localisation targets versus reported progressTarget: local partners, FY202525%Target: locally led programming,203050%Reported: direct local funding,FY20239.6%Share of eligible funding awarded directly to local partners, USAID localization progress report for FY2023 (down from10.2 % in FY2022); the agency was dismantled in 2025.
The most concrete localisation commitment of the decade, and the documented shortfall. Source: Devex, USAID localization report. Figure: evaluacia.sk, based on the sources cited in the article.

What changed

Culturally responsive evaluation (Stafford Hood, Rodney Hopson) was already established in the United States by 2016; what changed afterwards was the shift from adapting methods to context toward explicit critiques of power, epistemology and ownership. Three movements matured. Made in Africa Evaluation, championed by the African Evaluation Association and theorised by Bagele Chilisa, gained a working definition (2021), a special collection in the African Evaluation Journal and a handbook (2025).

Indigenous evaluation was formalised globally through EvalIndigenous (an EvalPartners network founded in 2015) and a 2018 New Directions for Evaluation issue edited by Fiona Cram and colleagues. The Equitable Evaluation Framework of Jara Dean-Coffey's Equitable Evaluation Initiative (2017) reframed philanthropic evaluation around three principles and a set of "orthodoxies" to be questioned.

The 2023 Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation special issue Decolonizing Evaluation: Towards a Fifth Paradigm and Donna Mertens's proposal of a fifth branch on the evaluation theory tree mark the academic high-water mark. On the donor side, USAID's 2021 localisation targets (25 per cent of funding to local partners by 2025, half of programming "locally led" by 2030) produced a new indicator, a measurement debate and, by 2025, a documented shortfall before the agency itself was dismantled.

Frameworks and tools

  • Culturally responsive and equitable evaluation (CREE)
  • the Equitable Evaluation Framework
  • Made in Africa Evaluation and the AfrEA standards
  • Indigenous evaluation frameworks
  • feminist evaluation and feminist participatory action research
  • the UN "Leave No One Behind" lens in SDG evaluation
  • USAID's locally-led indicator

Vocabulary to recognise

  • Decolonising
  • epistemic justice
  • epistemic violence
  • CREE
  • power-sharing
  • shift the power
  • locally led
  • LNOB
  • fifth paradigm
  • reflexivity
  • positionality

Live controversies

Whether decolonisation is substantive or performative ("decolonial reflexivity" versus a paragraph in the inception report); tensions between equity-centred approaches and the independence and rigour norms of the profession; whether localisation should be measured by funding flows or by who holds decision power; principal–agent problems in localisation (Ranil Dissanayake at CGD); and the 2024–25 political backlash against diversity, equity and inclusion in the United States, which pushed some evaluators to rebrand equity work and put federal equity-focused evaluation funding at risk.

Further reading

About the author. Andrej Salner is an economist and evaluator, co-founder of the Slovak Governance Institute and of evaluacia.sk. He has designed and led evaluations for Slovak ministries, EU and EEA programmes and NGOs since 2004. More about the team · Impact measurement & evaluation services.
A note on authorship and method. This series was researched and written by Andrej Salner with the assistance of AI tools (large language models used for literature search, summarising and drafting). The framing, the selection of sources, the judgements and the final text are the author's, and the author takes responsibility for them; links were checked in September 2026. The Slovak version is an AI-assisted translation of the English original, reviewed by the author. Corrections and additions are welcome at info@evaluacia.sk.
← PreviousNext →